Well, you could talk to one of the two engineers who actually did the project...me being one of them.
Unless it was the FAA project engineer (and I know who it was, and I know he won't remember, :lol: ), your FAA contact doesn't know either.
And yes, other structure was analyzed; in this case load comparison. Testing was indeed not required for wings, etc. However, you need the numbers to show that you do not need to test. In this senario, its not a big deal, but its not true that nothing else was looked at. Also, its sort of insulting and naive to say we did nothing but a drop test. A fair gambit of performance testing and sound testing goes along with any change to the operating weight, even if the airplane is unchanged.
The 7-1535 wing frame is the metal spar wing. That one is clear. 1990 and up production.
The 7-1521 COVERED wing is where the loophole lies. In current revision, it only calls out the 7-1535 frame to be covered. However, if you go back to older revisions (i.e. the 70's) it calls out a later version of the wood wing. 7-1521 revision "B" and older call out wing frame 7-1525. Therefore, technically, it looks like a 1977+ wing would fall in. Which also happens to be the time they intoduced the Super Deacthlon with the 180 HP anyway. Older decathlons will have used a different covered wing frame drawing and will even be excluded from the loophole. (If memory serves me, those would be the non-removable wing tips.)
We basically listed both the frame and the covered part number because we sell the wing frame uncovered as well; and did not want to tie down the owner who did his own STC or PMA covering / painting.